<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sound Off: RT Thanks or Not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bkmacdaddy.com/blog/sound-off-rt-thanks-or-not/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bkmacdaddy.com/blog/sound-off-rt-thanks-or-not</link>
	<description>This is the &#34;unofficial&#34; blog of Brian K. McDaniel, the &#34;BKM&#34; in bkmacdaddy designs. Here you will find resources related to web &#38; graphic design, social media and more! But mostly you will wander around inside the head of Brian. Buckle up and hold on...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: couponboa</title>
		<link>http://www.bkmacdaddy.com/blog/sound-off-rt-thanks-or-not/comment-page-1#comment-3061</link>
		<dc:creator>couponboa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 05:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkmacdaddy.com/blog/?p=436#comment-3061</guid>
		<description>Vouched for &#039;Thank You&#039; RT. 

It&#039;s a good social gesture and don&#039;t we thank people, when they help us in real life anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vouched for &#8216;Thank You&#8217; RT. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good social gesture and don&#8217;t we thank people, when they help us in real life anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inspiring Pixel</title>
		<link>http://www.bkmacdaddy.com/blog/sound-off-rt-thanks-or-not/comment-page-1#comment-2141</link>
		<dc:creator>Inspiring Pixel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkmacdaddy.com/blog/?p=436#comment-2141</guid>
		<description>As I mentioned in my tweet. It does become annoying. 
IMHO, if it is your own Tweet/Article link that was RT&#039;ed It is perfectly OK.
But then, doing it at every instant I RT a tweet turns out to be a not so pleasant experience for the person on the other side. Your intentions might be correct and I truly believe they are, but getting a buzz of mention everytime you thank me for an RT is just not done. I liked your stuff, I RT&#039;ed it. End of story. 
If you want to show gratitude keep letting such awesome RTable tweets come. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I mentioned in my tweet. It does become annoying.<br />
IMHO, if it is your own Tweet/Article link that was RT&#8217;ed It is perfectly OK.<br />
But then, doing it at every instant I RT a tweet turns out to be a not so pleasant experience for the person on the other side. Your intentions might be correct and I truly believe they are, but getting a buzz of mention everytime you thank me for an RT is just not done. I liked your stuff, I RT&#8217;ed it. End of story.<br />
If you want to show gratitude keep letting such awesome RTable tweets come. <img src='http://www.bkmacdaddy.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.bkmacdaddy.com/blog/sound-off-rt-thanks-or-not/comment-page-1#comment-1489</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkmacdaddy.com/blog/?p=436#comment-1489</guid>
		<description>Brian, 

I read the post and actually think that the author, has some good points, but in my eyes is wrong on many levels about this one...

Tweeting about lunch plans, politics, religion, thanking people publicly, cryptic replies??

I think these are all fine, Twitter has a lot of noise and as if you choose to follow a mass amount of people you have to be able to shut some of it off sometimes.  

People do feel happy when you thank them for actually listening to your twitter feed long enough to RT something.  It is very easy for someone to get on Twitter and essentially talk to themselves...a thank you for RT&#039;ing is a good thing.  

There was much more I would like to say about that post but won&#039;t as is does not relate to this one...

I think you are awesome and right on the money on this point...

Keep the Peace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, </p>
<p>I read the post and actually think that the author, has some good points, but in my eyes is wrong on many levels about this one&#8230;</p>
<p>Tweeting about lunch plans, politics, religion, thanking people publicly, cryptic replies??</p>
<p>I think these are all fine, Twitter has a lot of noise and as if you choose to follow a mass amount of people you have to be able to shut some of it off sometimes.  </p>
<p>People do feel happy when you thank them for actually listening to your twitter feed long enough to RT something.  It is very easy for someone to get on Twitter and essentially talk to themselves&#8230;a thank you for RT&#8217;ing is a good thing.  </p>
<p>There was much more I would like to say about that post but won&#8217;t as is does not relate to this one&#8230;</p>
<p>I think you are awesome and right on the money on this point&#8230;</p>
<p>Keep the Peace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.bkmacdaddy.com/blog/sound-off-rt-thanks-or-not/comment-page-1#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkmacdaddy.com/blog/?p=436#comment-835</guid>
		<description>I really appreciate how you received my comments. Yours is an excellent approach because you&#039;re right: if you stay true to your good intentions, over the course of time your intended message speaks much louder than the subtle, overwrought misinterpretations people may have. I know some people who never reply to comments because they don&#039;t want to interrupt the thought flow. They reply via email or in subsequent posts. Yet others try to comment on just about every thought in their comment thread--all of them are thoughtful, sensitive people who use two different approaches to foster a sense of community. And they do it successfully.

You seem very much to fit in that same category, and I applaud you. You took my point well: people can interpret good messages in negative ways--but you can&#039;t please everyone. Thanks for the great discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really appreciate how you received my comments. Yours is an excellent approach because you&#8217;re right: if you stay true to your good intentions, over the course of time your intended message speaks much louder than the subtle, overwrought misinterpretations people may have. I know some people who never reply to comments because they don&#8217;t want to interrupt the thought flow. They reply via email or in subsequent posts. Yet others try to comment on just about every thought in their comment thread&#8211;all of them are thoughtful, sensitive people who use two different approaches to foster a sense of community. And they do it successfully.</p>
<p>You seem very much to fit in that same category, and I applaud you. You took my point well: people can interpret good messages in negative ways&#8211;but you can&#8217;t please everyone. Thanks for the great discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bkmacdaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.bkmacdaddy.com/blog/sound-off-rt-thanks-or-not/comment-page-1#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>bkmacdaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkmacdaddy.com/blog/?p=436#comment-834</guid>
		<description>Fantastic response, Adam! I don&#039;t agree with everything you&#039;ve said, but I am thrilled that you put the time and thought into this comment that you obviously did. As you pointed out, it is in my nature to now respond point-by-point. But I want to avoid that. I do however want to touch on one thing. You said my desire to respond to almost every comment on my blog can be interpreted as trying to control the conversation. I find that intriguing when another comment in this same post (Johnny, up above yours) interprets this is a sign of the good person that I try to be. I must admit I never looked at it the way you have, and really try to comment to encourage repeat visits, community and interaction. But you have reminded me how so many different people can interpret every little thing in countless different ways. My approach in the past has been to try to accommodate for this, but I have learned through many experiences that it is a fruitless effort and in the end I must strive for my own integrity in the things I do. Some will interpret it as I intended and some will not. But my responsibility is not their interpretation. My responsibility is the integrity of my intention.
A friend of mine sent me this quote this week:
&quot;The skill of writing is to create a context in which other people can think.&quot; (Edwin Schlossberg)
Your well-thought-out response flatters me to believe I have succeeded in accomplishing that creation with this post. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic response, Adam! I don&#8217;t agree with everything you&#8217;ve said, but I am thrilled that you put the time and thought into this comment that you obviously did. As you pointed out, it is in my nature to now respond point-by-point. But I want to avoid that. I do however want to touch on one thing. You said my desire to respond to almost every comment on my blog can be interpreted as trying to control the conversation. I find that intriguing when another comment in this same post (Johnny, up above yours) interprets this is a sign of the good person that I try to be. I must admit I never looked at it the way you have, and really try to comment to encourage repeat visits, community and interaction. But you have reminded me how so many different people can interpret every little thing in countless different ways. My approach in the past has been to try to accommodate for this, but I have learned through many experiences that it is a fruitless effort and in the end I must strive for my own integrity in the things I do. Some will interpret it as I intended and some will not. But my responsibility is not their interpretation. My responsibility is the integrity of my intention.<br />
A friend of mine sent me this quote this week:<br />
&#8220;The skill of writing is to create a context in which other people can think.&#8221; (Edwin Schlossberg)<br />
Your well-thought-out response flatters me to believe I have succeeded in accomplishing that creation with this post. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.bkmacdaddy.com/blog/sound-off-rt-thanks-or-not/comment-page-1#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkmacdaddy.com/blog/?p=436#comment-833</guid>
		<description>I understand what you&#039;re saying, but here&#039;s a few things to consider about how your communication can send messages you never intended:

1. You reply to just about every comment on your blog. When only a couple of people comment, that&#039;s understandable. But when it&#039;s a long string of comments, it indicates maybe a slight propensity to wanting to control the conversation. By commenting on every single post, you might inadvertently be telling readers you won&#039;t allow anyone to disagree with you without a fight. This can also prevent people from feeling comfortable talking with each other--your guests aren&#039;t free to talk amongst themselves, many of them might feel forced to engage in dozens of individual conversations with you and only you.

2. You admit to being stubborn and unlikely to admit you&#039;re wrong--if any of your followers pick up on this (maybe they&#039;ve witnessed you arguing over small disagreements) they are probably hesitant to publicly disagree with you on something you feel so strongly about. Usually people in your camp are much more likely than your dissenters to offer public commentary, a trend that is only enhanced if you tend to be argumentative.

3. Lost in the &quot;obviously you thank people for doing something nice&quot; argument is the inherent implication that you view an RT as a favor. There&#039;s a further implication there that make some people cringe and others say, &quot;duh&quot; to: What you want out of twitter is more followers, more exposure, more recognition.

Thanking people for an RT is an acknowledgment that you view the RT as beneficial to you. Maybe it&#039;s flattering. Maybe it&#039;s just nice to have someone find your words worth repeating. Of course you&#039;d thank someone for that! But to some people (be they cynical, paranoid, or just plain irritable) thanking for an RT is an acknowledgment that it&#039;s what you wanted all along. Like you&#039;re saying, &quot;Thanks for the RT, I was hoping someone would repeat it.&quot; It&#039;s drawing attention to your desire for more publicity.

That doesn&#039;t have to be your motive for people to perceive it as such. It&#039;s just one of those unfortunate byproducts of mass communication. 

I struggle with this question, because on one hand I feel like if I say nothing to thank people, I&#039;m a jerk who is totally ignoring a flattering gesture; if I DM them, I feel like I&#039;m intentionally avoiding mentioning them in public, as if to say, &quot;Yes, I do crave more attention and more RTs, but I don&#039;t want any of my glory to reflect back on you,&quot; which just feels creepy; if I publicly thank them for the RT in an @ reply, I feel like I&#039;m just calling attention to myself.

So I feel uneasy about the issue in general. I guess I&#039;m just insecure when it comes to public praise; always have been, probably always will. My approach is still evolving, but I can understand both sides of the issue. Here&#039;s my current approach (which I&#039;m sure will change within the month):

If someone RTs a link to my blog, I thank them. I wanted people to read my blog, which is why I posted a link to it--I don&#039;t feel bad about that because the most I ever do it is a couple times in one day. 

If someone RTs with a comment (ie they were just giving their audience the context of their response) I respond if the occasion calls for it.

If someone RTs something I RTd, I do nothing.

If someone I know RTs a post of mine that stood on its own, I try to acknowledge the gesture with a comment that adds to the idea and a general spirit of gratitude and friendship.

If someone I don&#039;t know RTs, I check to see if they&#039;re a bot. If not, I usually will follow them, thank them for the RT and add a positive comment about their recent posts I just discovered.

But I might be thinking about all this waaay too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand what you&#8217;re saying, but here&#8217;s a few things to consider about how your communication can send messages you never intended:</p>
<p>1. You reply to just about every comment on your blog. When only a couple of people comment, that&#8217;s understandable. But when it&#8217;s a long string of comments, it indicates maybe a slight propensity to wanting to control the conversation. By commenting on every single post, you might inadvertently be telling readers you won&#8217;t allow anyone to disagree with you without a fight. This can also prevent people from feeling comfortable talking with each other&#8211;your guests aren&#8217;t free to talk amongst themselves, many of them might feel forced to engage in dozens of individual conversations with you and only you.</p>
<p>2. You admit to being stubborn and unlikely to admit you&#8217;re wrong&#8211;if any of your followers pick up on this (maybe they&#8217;ve witnessed you arguing over small disagreements) they are probably hesitant to publicly disagree with you on something you feel so strongly about. Usually people in your camp are much more likely than your dissenters to offer public commentary, a trend that is only enhanced if you tend to be argumentative.</p>
<p>3. Lost in the &#8220;obviously you thank people for doing something nice&#8221; argument is the inherent implication that you view an RT as a favor. There&#8217;s a further implication there that make some people cringe and others say, &#8220;duh&#8221; to: What you want out of twitter is more followers, more exposure, more recognition.</p>
<p>Thanking people for an RT is an acknowledgment that you view the RT as beneficial to you. Maybe it&#8217;s flattering. Maybe it&#8217;s just nice to have someone find your words worth repeating. Of course you&#8217;d thank someone for that! But to some people (be they cynical, paranoid, or just plain irritable) thanking for an RT is an acknowledgment that it&#8217;s what you wanted all along. Like you&#8217;re saying, &#8220;Thanks for the RT, I was hoping someone would repeat it.&#8221; It&#8217;s drawing attention to your desire for more publicity.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t have to be your motive for people to perceive it as such. It&#8217;s just one of those unfortunate byproducts of mass communication. </p>
<p>I struggle with this question, because on one hand I feel like if I say nothing to thank people, I&#8217;m a jerk who is totally ignoring a flattering gesture; if I DM them, I feel like I&#8217;m intentionally avoiding mentioning them in public, as if to say, &#8220;Yes, I do crave more attention and more RTs, but I don&#8217;t want any of my glory to reflect back on you,&#8221; which just feels creepy; if I publicly thank them for the RT in an @ reply, I feel like I&#8217;m just calling attention to myself.</p>
<p>So I feel uneasy about the issue in general. I guess I&#8217;m just insecure when it comes to public praise; always have been, probably always will. My approach is still evolving, but I can understand both sides of the issue. Here&#8217;s my current approach (which I&#8217;m sure will change within the month):</p>
<p>If someone RTs a link to my blog, I thank them. I wanted people to read my blog, which is why I posted a link to it&#8211;I don&#8217;t feel bad about that because the most I ever do it is a couple times in one day. </p>
<p>If someone RTs with a comment (ie they were just giving their audience the context of their response) I respond if the occasion calls for it.</p>
<p>If someone RTs something I RTd, I do nothing.</p>
<p>If someone I know RTs a post of mine that stood on its own, I try to acknowledge the gesture with a comment that adds to the idea and a general spirit of gratitude and friendship.</p>
<p>If someone I don&#8217;t know RTs, I check to see if they&#8217;re a bot. If not, I usually will follow them, thank them for the RT and add a positive comment about their recent posts I just discovered.</p>
<p>But I might be thinking about all this waaay too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bkmacdaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.bkmacdaddy.com/blog/sound-off-rt-thanks-or-not/comment-page-1#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>bkmacdaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkmacdaddy.com/blog/?p=436#comment-832</guid>
		<description>Thank you for a great step by step and succinct explanation. I agree! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for a great step by step and succinct explanation. I agree! <img src='http://www.bkmacdaddy.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bkmacdaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.bkmacdaddy.com/blog/sound-off-rt-thanks-or-not/comment-page-1#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>bkmacdaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkmacdaddy.com/blog/?p=436#comment-831</guid>
		<description>A good point, my friend. And one that others have mentioned also. It appears there is value beyond simple politeness to the RT Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good point, my friend. And one that others have mentioned also. It appears there is value beyond simple politeness to the RT Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bkmacdaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.bkmacdaddy.com/blog/sound-off-rt-thanks-or-not/comment-page-1#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>bkmacdaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkmacdaddy.com/blog/?p=436#comment-830</guid>
		<description>Finally someone responds who has another viewpoint! I appreciate you sharing. I think it&#039;s hard to address your point without pointing to all of the other comments here that overwhelmingly disagree with you. The main reason I wrote this post was to hear others&#039; opinions and get a general consensus. It appears that the people have spoken pretty clearly, since you are the only one who has said the RT thanx is too noisy. And the beauty of it is that you can act upon your opinion by deciding who to follow, not follow and whether or not you want to thank anyone! I think it&#039;s great to continue to exercise the freedoms that Twitter allows us in our own independent ways. I just hope we will each be considerate enough to refrain from trying to tell others what they should or shouldn&#039;t do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally someone responds who has another viewpoint! I appreciate you sharing. I think it&#8217;s hard to address your point without pointing to all of the other comments here that overwhelmingly disagree with you. The main reason I wrote this post was to hear others&#8217; opinions and get a general consensus. It appears that the people have spoken pretty clearly, since you are the only one who has said the RT thanx is too noisy. And the beauty of it is that you can act upon your opinion by deciding who to follow, not follow and whether or not you want to thank anyone! I think it&#8217;s great to continue to exercise the freedoms that Twitter allows us in our own independent ways. I just hope we will each be considerate enough to refrain from trying to tell others what they should or shouldn&#8217;t do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bkmacdaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.bkmacdaddy.com/blog/sound-off-rt-thanks-or-not/comment-page-1#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>bkmacdaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkmacdaddy.com/blog/?p=436#comment-829</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the input. I obviously agree with your assessment. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the input. I obviously agree with your assessment. <img src='http://www.bkmacdaddy.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
