
If you have watched any live television in the past month with the unfortunate inability to fast forward through the commercials, you have most likely witnessed the back and forth advertising campaigns of AT&T and Verizon. It started with Verizon’s launching of the new Droid phone and an all-out bashing of the current king of all smartphones, the iPhone. Verizon decided to seize the opportunity to point out AT&T’s lacking 3G coverage along the way, playing on the iPhone’s catch phrase, “There’s an app for that”. Verizon cleverly changed it to “There’s a map for that”, showing US maps displaying the disparities between the two competitors’ 3G coverage.
Not to be outdone, AT&T has launched its retaliation campaign, bringing in celebrity Luke Wilson to point out that AT&T has coverage for 97% of the country (deceitfully refraining from stating the fact that this number is not reflective of their spotty 3G-specific coverage, which is what Verizon was attacking), and attempting to punch back at Verizon by stating that the only comparison chart column they excel in is the one for a company name that starts with the letter ‘V’.
It’s only been a few weeks since the feuding began, but I’m already disgusted and exhausted with it. From my perspective, this type of advertising would be enough to drive me to cancel my contract with either one of them and find another cell phone service provider.
In my opinion, mudslinging is the not only the wrong way to sell your products, your politics, your services and/or your brand; it’s the lowest form of campaign imaginable.
Whatever the context, is it really a wise move to spend the majority of your time and money proclaiming what your competitor does not have, or has failed in, or pointing out their weaknesses and mistakes? Shouldn’t you instead be sharing with the world the amazing things that YOU have to offer, without basing your purported greatness on its comparison to others?
I firmly believe that if you feel the need to chop others down in order to make yourself appear taller, you have a problem. Insecurity and lack of confidence in who you are and what you have to offer are what come shining through this marketing tactic, and that is a major fail in my book. I’m not interested in voting for a candidate that spends less time telling me what they are going to do than they spend telling me how bad their opposition is. In essence this method is suggesting that I make a choice for the lesser of two evils – neither choice is a good one, so let’s make sure you know which choice is the worst one.
If these are the options, I would like to choose none.
This ‘rant’ is not really about AT&T vs. Verizon or the Droid vs. the iPhone. I’m actually a T-mobile customer and I have a myTouch 3G, so none of these battles really affect me personally. But I am thoroughly disgusted with campaigns – advertising, branding, marketing, politics, etc. – that insult my intelligence by assuming that I would prefer to settle, making a decision for malicious mediocrity over whatever they can prove is worse.
My kids, though not entirely grown, have moved past the point of constant bickering and poking and teasing. It is refreshing to see them enjoy each others’ friendship and to have interesting and funny conversations with them. My wife and I are thankful that we have moved beyond those childish years for the most part and are seeing our offspring become responsible, caring and self-confident enough to discard the insecurity-driven need for belittling others in an effort to feel better about themselves.
It is unfortunate and disappointing that certain media’s example of how adults treat each other can sometimes be far more childish, irresponsible and insecure than our own children.
My advice and my challenge, for myself and for you: don’t waste your energy looking to others for your own self-worth. You are a unique individual with much to offer. Use that energy to search within yourself for the priceless value that is who you are, and then grow and share the amazing gift of you. In your life, your relationships, your job, your self-marketing – in every context.
Because in the end, no one else can do you like you. And that makes you a one-of-a-kind treasure.
No one else can beat that.
- « 3 Keys To Attracting New Clients On Twitter
- » Don’t Let Your Bad Attitude Or Ethics Ruin It For The Rest Of Us!
- RELATED / YOU MIGHT FIND THESE INTERESTING
Comments ( 19 )
“My advice and my challenge, for myself and for you: don’t waste your energy looking to others for your own self-worth. You are a unique individual with much to offer. Use that energy to search within yourself for the priceless value that is who you are, and then grow and share the amazing gift of you. In your life, your relationships, your job, your self-marketing – in every context.
Because in the end, no one else can do you like you. And that makes you a one-of-a-kind treasure.
No one else can beat that.”
I LIKE this! Way to tie it all together!
[Reply]
Well said Brian. Its true, I like campaigns that are subtle and highlight a reason to buy, not reasons not to buy another.
However, i have to say this particular feud is something that I find so interesting. Probably for the fact that I long for an iphone but wont switch from verizon’s great service!!!!
[Reply]
bkmacdaddy Reply:
November 25th, 2009 at 7:27 amThanks for the comment, Christian. Since I have no vested interest in either company this feud just annoys and irritates me. It’s like watching two little boys on the playground. No thanks! But I have coveted an iPhone for years, and although I have recently purchased an Android phone, I have to admit – nothing will replace or “beat” the iPhone in coolness factor.
[Reply]
AMEN! Yes, let’s focus on positive things rather than bash each other.
[Reply]
bkmacdaddy Reply:
November 25th, 2009 at 7:28 amThanks for stopping by and adding your 2 cents, Vince!
[Reply]
I like Sprint’s approach to ads. Clever and generally they stay out of the mud.
[Reply]
bkmacdaddy Reply:
November 25th, 2009 at 7:29 amI agree. If you are confident in what you have to offer, you don’t have to bother with attacking your competitors. Cheers to Sprint!
[Reply]
I think there are times when the visible competition between companies can be much lighter or tongue in cheek. That I don’t mind. Especially since it indicates they’re able to laugh at themselves too.
Apple and Microsoft seem to be between jovial competition and “the competition is worse in X way.” I think with them though, the problem is that their operating systems are not drastically different to the user (not trying to start a debate; but I use both and it’s very easy to switch back and forth). It’s pretty clear that they both encourage each other to innovate, which is good for the consumer.
The commercials that used to annoy me the most were the AOL ads that treated their customers like idiots. I mean really, that’s how you think of your customers? What a terrible attitude.
[Reply]
bkmacdaddy Reply:
November 25th, 2009 at 7:30 amGood point, Emily. I thoroughly enjoy the good-spirited competition of Microsoft and Apple’s ads. It’s when ads get mean and spiteful and petty that I’m turned off. And I turn off the ad!
[Reply]
Good post. I’ve always said you should tell someone what you CAN do, NOT what your competition CAN’T do. But my biggest question…what the heck is in the picture????
[Reply]
Verizon/ATT ; Apple/Microsoft (i’m a mac! I’m a PC!) ; now you have GM taking potshots at Honda/Toyota; the ad world is full of nasty duels. They can be entertaining to watch, but is taking the low-road really the way to go?
[Reply]
bkmacdaddy Reply:
November 25th, 2009 at 7:31 amSee my response to Emily (above). Competition is good and fun to watch when it’s done with respect and maturity, IMHO.
[Reply]
That’s a very good article Brian.
I was also very put off with the way that Apple and Microsoft fought it out – even moreso by Microsoft’s embarassing editing talents.
Thanks for the post – it’s good to have people commenting on this effect of poor advertising.
[Reply]
bkmacdaddy Reply:
November 25th, 2009 at 7:32 amThanks for the comment, Clement. I do like Micrsosft and Apple’s approach a bit more (and the Apple ads are pretty funny). Microsoft’s editing is another story of failure. Pretty lame.
[Reply]
There is a B School case study about the Coke vs Pepsi ad battles of the 80s and 90s. The net is that the battle put both brands top of mindshare and locked other brands out of the discussion affecting RC and Dr. Pepper etc. So, is any name mention good?
This does however point up and ride on the “VS” focussed discourse our society has fallen into. The result: our government is at a standstill because our representatives want to take sides rather than represent us. Public service is NOT public entitlement.[Reply]





bkmacdaddy Reply:
November 25th, 2009 at 7:25 am
Thanks Susie – I know I can always count on you for encouragement and support!
[Reply]